![<?echo $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'];?>](/template/twentyseventeen/skin/images/header.jpg)
Although Chinese companies v. European, American, and Japanese dumping of chloroprene rubber in China ended with the Chinese victory, the excessively low punitive tax rate has not effectively prevented the dumping of foreign products in the Chinese market for more than four months. The leader of Chongqing Changshou Chemical Co., Ltd., who had led the anti-dumping lawsuit, and Shanxi Synthetic Rubber Group Co., Ltd. told reporters yesterday that they are collecting relevant evidence and proposes to apply at the next review stage to request an increase in foreign imports. It is the anti-dumping duty rate of chloroprene rubber imported from Japan.
According to Liu Yu, chairman of San Francisco’s rubber company, since 2000, Japanese, U.S., and European Union companies have sold neoprene rubber in China at prices that are lower than normal. As a major domestic manufacturer of chloroprene rubber, Changhua and Shan Oak jointly initiated anti-dumping lawsuits and achieved success. According to the final result of the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China on May 10 this year, the imported neoprene was imposed with a penalty rate of 2% to 151%. However, the daily production of neoprene was only levied by 2% to 3% of the anti-dumping rate. tax. The amount of chloroprene rubber imported by Japan in the domestic market accounts for 75% of the total import volume. Therefore, it is difficult to restrict the use of chloroprene rubber imported from Japan. As a result, the dumping impacts faced by the two companies in the past few months are still very large.
Liu Ye said that from the relevant data we have learned, the price of the Japanese market for neoprene should be more than 30,000 yuan per ton, and the current price of Japanese companies in the Chinese market is much lower than this, and its dumping rate Obviously more than 2%. Moreover, from the domestic data on imports of neoprene since May, the import of neoprene from Japan before and after the anti-dumping final cut did not decrease. This shows that the tax rate determined by the final ruling has little effect on preventing the dumping of Japanese companies.
Xu Yaping, chairman of Changshou Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., said that although the domestic market price for neoprene has picked up this year, this is the result of the international oil price rising at a long time, resulting in the general increase in the price of neoprene rubber in the international market. If this factor is deducted, the price of neoprene in the Chinese market is almost the same as last year.
According to reports, after China’s Ministry of Commerce announced the final ruling in May this year, Changhua and Shan Oak did not give up their efforts. Instead, they have been collecting relevant evidence in an attempt to file an appeal to the Ministry of Commerce during the annual mid-term review. Anti-dumping tariffs on Nissan neoprene rubber. The CEOs of the two companies stressed that even if the penalty rates for Japanese products were raised, the price of neoprene in the domestic market would not fluctuate significantly due to severe oversupply.
According to Liu Yu, chairman of San Francisco’s rubber company, since 2000, Japanese, U.S., and European Union companies have sold neoprene rubber in China at prices that are lower than normal. As a major domestic manufacturer of chloroprene rubber, Changhua and Shan Oak jointly initiated anti-dumping lawsuits and achieved success. According to the final result of the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China on May 10 this year, the imported neoprene was imposed with a penalty rate of 2% to 151%. However, the daily production of neoprene was only levied by 2% to 3% of the anti-dumping rate. tax. The amount of chloroprene rubber imported by Japan in the domestic market accounts for 75% of the total import volume. Therefore, it is difficult to restrict the use of chloroprene rubber imported from Japan. As a result, the dumping impacts faced by the two companies in the past few months are still very large.
Liu Ye said that from the relevant data we have learned, the price of the Japanese market for neoprene should be more than 30,000 yuan per ton, and the current price of Japanese companies in the Chinese market is much lower than this, and its dumping rate Obviously more than 2%. Moreover, from the domestic data on imports of neoprene since May, the import of neoprene from Japan before and after the anti-dumping final cut did not decrease. This shows that the tax rate determined by the final ruling has little effect on preventing the dumping of Japanese companies.
Xu Yaping, chairman of Changshou Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., said that although the domestic market price for neoprene has picked up this year, this is the result of the international oil price rising at a long time, resulting in the general increase in the price of neoprene rubber in the international market. If this factor is deducted, the price of neoprene in the Chinese market is almost the same as last year.
According to reports, after China’s Ministry of Commerce announced the final ruling in May this year, Changhua and Shan Oak did not give up their efforts. Instead, they have been collecting relevant evidence in an attempt to file an appeal to the Ministry of Commerce during the annual mid-term review. Anti-dumping tariffs on Nissan neoprene rubber. The CEOs of the two companies stressed that even if the penalty rates for Japanese products were raised, the price of neoprene in the domestic market would not fluctuate significantly due to severe oversupply.
Construction Hardware,Building Hardware,Building Hardwares,Hardware Building Materials
Ningbo Zongchi Machinery Technology Co., LTD , https://www.zcdiecastservice.com